Aspectism is a type of visual art which only attempts to represent outward appearances. Emotional experiences are desirable because they are controlled by reason – Passionate experiences are not desirable because they are not controlled by reason everything in nature consists of matter and consciousness. Visual art does not fully convey the artist’s inner Emotional experiences, nor does it control emotional experiences when the audience sees the work. Art itself should focus on the beautiful appearance of object.
The term “aspectism” is discrimination based simply on aesthetic motives. It is a form of invisibility of certain people that, in addition, can be based on the most unpredictable aesthetic criteria. For example, it may go against people who are not tall, against people who, regardless of their physique, dress in a certain way, or with people who do not fit with a beauty class rigidly marked by a very specific trend.
Aspectism is Similar to Objectism, but more biased in psychology, mainly personal aesthetic preference. The process of constructing a model of the psychological universe involves many philosophical assumptions. The two most relevant philosophical issues for the psychologist are (1) the mind–body problem and (2) the nature of the human being. The fact that these two issues have not been resolved at a philosophical level helps explain the current pluralistic state of psychology. Every system of psychology must take a position on each of these issues and then proceed accordingly. The mind–body problem has both epistemological and metaphysical aspects; the nature of the human being is a metaphysical issue.
The mind-body problem is a pseudobroblem, Aspectism is another dualistic view which suggests that the individual cannot be divided into mind and body but it consists of a unity which experiences bodily and mental events at the same time. The bodily and mental events are the two sides of human being. According to this view the body and the mind cannot interact, they are simply two sides of each event we experience as humans
Criticism
Aspectism is especially harmful because it acts practically automatically, and often is alien to the will of the people. The personal image of someone is something that is captured instantly, at a glance. It does not require any effort or dedicate a time to set as an objective to study the appearance of others, but it is captured spontaneously.
This means that, once a social dynamic has been created in which the personal aspect is determinant, this discriminative bias occurs in all facets of life.
In recent decades, the desired body silhouette has undergone drastic changes, so that models are thinner and higher as a paradigm of beauty in women. Advertising influences so that styles and physical attributes are socially considered more or less attractive: splendid bodies are used as a claim to increase sales.
Just as in the case of discrimination against, for example, homosexuals do not happen instantly until the sexual tendency of the person is known, it is aspectism that lets you notice their influences from the minute zero in which visual contact is established. That is, in most of the social interactions that an average person establishes in a day. In addition, another effect of the aspectismo is that it is complemented with the halo effect.
Aspectism is easy to cause the halo effect, which is a psychological phenomenon by which a specific characteristic of someone determines whether we judge more positively or more negatively the rest of their characteristics and, ultimately, the person as a whole.
Double Aspectism:
The former position is clearly interactionist, whereas the latter view, in which mind and matter are not truly separate, can best be described as double aspectism. Although the latter view attempts to be materialist, it is technically a dualistic view. In both cases, materiality is a statement about how humans function.
Double aspectism refers to Spinoza’s contention that material substance and consciousness are two inseparable aspects of everything in the universe, including humans. It is the belief that bodily and mental events are inseparable because they are two aspects of every experience.
The mind–body problem in a psychological context reduces to the question of the relationship existing between consciousness and behavior. Four broad classes of philosophical resolutions apply: (1) dualism, (2) monism, (3) epiphenomenalism, and (4) double aspectism. Epistemology concerns the ultimate nature and source of truth; metaphysics involves the nature of reality and the kinds of substances of which it is composed. Overall, Block seems to equate property dualism and dual-aspectism, much as Nagel has done.